Lawyer (with law school)
$80,000 – $150,000+
Logic and argument are the LSAT's core
Degree guide
The degree with the best punchline-to-outcomes gap in the university: philosophy majors train for exactly what the LSAT tests, feed tech ethics boards, and out-argue everyone in the meeting. Here is the honest case.
Rigorous argument, spotting hidden assumptions, writing that survives hostile readers — law, policy, consulting and increasingly AI governance pay well for exactly this. The degree's honest weakness is the missing default path: philosophy grads must choose a vehicle deliberately (law being the classic) or drift. The drifters become the cautionary tales; the choosers become the law-school success stories.
Typical Canadian ranges from Job Bank medians, checked Oct 2026. Actual outcomes vary by role, location, experience, and employer.
$80,000 – $150,000+
Logic and argument are the LSAT's core
$60,000 – $95,000
Argument quality is the product
$70,000 – $120,000
A young field, hiring now
$70,000 – $110,000
Structured problem decomposition, billed hourly
$60,000 – $95,000
Precision about meaning, employed
$55,000 – $105,000
Social studies / ethics teachable
One of the best: formal logic, argument analysis and close reading are the coursework, and they are close to legal reasoning practice. If law is the plan, philosophy is a rigorous and honest way to spend the runway.
Increasingly: regulation (EU AI Act and successors) is forcing companies to staff governance, audit and policy roles, and philosophy-trained people who also understand the technology are scarce. Pair the degree with genuine technical literacy and this is a growth lane, not a novelty.
No default job, so the degree punishes passivity more than most. The fix is structural: pick the vehicle (law, policy stream, consulting recruiting, B.Ed) before final year and aim the writing sample at it.